Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
More from our inbox:
To the Editor:
Re “American Moms Need a Break,” by Jessica Grose (Opinion, July 10):
Ms. Grose contends that the American Academy of Pediatrics’ updated policy statement on breastfeeding was poorly timed. We disagree. At this critical time when pregnant people’s autonomy is threatened and parents scramble to find formula, this guidance, based on decades of evidence and best practices, exposes critical policy issues that our government has failed to address.
Ms. Grose argues that support for breastfeeding is disturbingly out of reach for most American women. We couldn’t agree more. We trust parents to make feeding choices that work for their families, while recognizing that it’s critical to advocate for resources so those goals are within reach.
The A.A.P.’s recommendations now echo the consensus of experts, including the World Health Organization and American Academy of Family Physicians, on the benefits of breastfeeding beyond one year. It’s time for the government and health care systems to fulfill their obligation to support the human rights of lactating families.
Breastfeeding has been compromised by weak policies and ignorance by the medical system. There is no bad timing for optimizing maternal and child health through breastfeeding, or for raising the bar on what families and society should expect. If not now, then when?
Jeannette T. Crenshaw
The writers are all medical professionals, and the letter was co-signed by six other health care providers.
To the Editor:
Jessica Grose’s essay on the A.A.P.’s updated breastfeeding guidelines left me puzzled and frustrated. On the surface, I think we’re in agreement on several of her points. As an international board certified lactation consultant and as a mother who struggled to make milk for and breastfeed my baby, I have seen firsthand just how difficult chestfeeding/breastfeeding can be.
But Ms. Grose sets up an impossible Catch-22, in which, because our society does such a poor job supporting lactation and breastfeeding, professional medical associations should not discuss the importance of breastfeeding and improving lactation support.
Do we drop guidelines on mammograms or other preventive screenings because uninsured people cannot easily access them? Do we give up on nutrition guidelines because many people live in food deserts? No. We write them to encourage better policies, inspire political action and educate health care providers.
It is strange that breastfeeding is treated so differently. Strange, but maybe predictable, given the decades of work that multibillion-dollar formula companies have done to undermine their primary competition.
To the Editor:
I am an experienced pediatric nurse practitioner who has breastfed three children. Mothers need support in making feeding choices early in the baby’s life, and this article could have been helpful in giving mothers strategies for how to manage.
For example, Jessica Grose does not mention that the policy describes in detail the immune-boosting effects of breast milk. Even if the baby is not exclusively breastfed, a working mother’s child in day care would greatly benefit from a feeding of breast milk morning and night. And even though there are no current federal laws giving mothers time to pump at work, I have witnessed many women quietly and efficiently pumping while eating lunch. Where there’s a will, there’s a way!
The medical community is by nature a helping profession, and the guidelines are meant to inform, not pressure, women. Pediatricians and nurse practitioners tell women that the important thing is that babies are well fed and that they grow properly. The choice of breastfeeding or formula is a personal one that is not criticized.
I feel that this piece was a missed opportunity to help and support mother and baby.
Source: Read Full Article