Von der Leyen says world is 'full of contradictions and conflict'
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The European Union’s top court ruled on Thursday that Poland’s system for disciplining judges undercuts the bloc’s laws, part of an escalating battle over democratic rules that risks Warsaw losing some of its key development funding. On the same day, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) sided with Warsaw against Berlin in a case over Gazprom’s access to the OPAL pipeline, which links the Russian gas producer’s Nord Stream line to Germany.
The ruling against Poland has sparked fears the country could soon decide to leave the bloc and follow Britain’s path outside the EU.
And according to Italian MEP Marco Zanni, others could soon follow if Brussels continues to push its United States of Europe agenda through the “back door”.
He warned: “Germany and Poland clash with the EU reaffirming the supremacy of their system over the European one: forcing the construction of a federal state through the ‘back door’ has only fuelled tensions.
“I have no doubt that others will follow.”
Poland’s ruling nationalists set up a disciplinary chamber at the Supreme Court in a sweeping overhaul of the judiciary already condemned by the ECJ in Luxembourg and the bloc’s Brussels-based executive, which acts as the guardian of laws across the 27 member states.
Reinforcing that, the ECJ ruled that the chamber “does not provide all the guarantees of impartiality and independence, and, in particular, is not protected from the direct or indirect influence of the Polish legislature and executive”.
The ECJ had already told Warsaw to immediately stop all proceedings at the disciplinary chamber but Poland’s top court said on Wednesday the demand ran counter to its constitution and the country should not comply.
“It is an obvious conclusion for any Polish citizen that the constitution is the highest legal act,” Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki told reporters on Thursday.
Both he and Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro said they considered the EU’s stance to be politically motivated.
READ MORE: Germany floods: Death toll rises to at least 81 as rescues continue
The row may lead to the ECJ imposing hefty fines on Warsaw or the other EU countries suspending financing. Poland is due to get some 770 billion zlotys from the bloc by 2028; its nominal GDP was 2.3 trillion zlotys in 2020.
The Polish ruling challenged the primacy of European laws over national ones, a key tenet of European integration.
That drew warnings that the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party is edging away from the EU, which has driven the ex-communist country’s social and economic development.
“It’s not Poland but Kaczynski and his party that are leaving the EU,” Donald Tusk – the head of Poland’s main opposition party, a former chairman of EU leaders and the arch-foe of PiS head Jaroslaw Kaczynski – said.
Covid CHAOS: Europe in crisis as terrifying chart shows cases SOARING [MAP]
Brexit LIVE: Von der Leyen in showdown talks today [LIVE BLOG]
Brussels threatens to cut EU funds to Poland as ‘Polexit’ row erupts [INSIGHT]
Warsaw’s refusal to comply with the ECJ does not mean it must now follow in Britain’s footsteps and trigger the formal EU divorce procedure. But it is undergoing a de-facto “legal Polexit of the judiciary”, an EU official said, moving further away from the bloc.
The European Commission on Thursday declined to comment on the spectre of “Polexit”. It said it was “deeply concerned” with the Polish Constitutional Tribunal ruling and that Warsaw had to “fully and correctly” implement all ECJ decisions.
Steve Peers, law professor at Britain’s University of Essex, said talk of Poland leaving the EU was an exaggeration, as legally it could not be thrown out and there was no sign of a Polish government trying to leave.
Warsaw still has time and scope to negotiate as more procedural steps would be needed before the ECJ could impose any fines.
The EU’s new mechanism to protect the rule of law by cutting financing for violators has not yet been tested and is highly politically sensitive.
Poland has been a top beneficiary of EU development aid since first joining in 2004. While not even the eurosceptic government may want to risk that, Poland’s rights ombudsman – a vocal PiS critic – said no one could be sure where such a crawling “legal Polexit” leads.
Source: Read Full Article